Friday, November 30, 2012

Article: 10 Ways A Dust Collection System Can Contribute To Your Plant’s Sustainability

A dust collector is designed to clean a factory of dust and fumes, thus making it fundamentally green.  By designing a dust collection system properly you can contribute to sustainability in many additional ways. An article appearing in Green Manufacturer magazine titled "10 Ways a dust collection system can contribute to your plant’s sustainability" written by air pollution control expert John Dauber, gives an easy overview in helping increase and maintain sustainability.

Make sure that the dust collector is compliant with the new U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Rule 6x regarding weld fumes and other airborne contaminants.   You can request a written guarantee from the equipment manager stating the dust collector meets the standards.  Size the collector properly for the application and area.  An undersized dust collector can result in high pressure drop, frequent filter changes, high energy usage, and a host of larger maintenance issues.

If you are being accountable for a  high standard of sustainability shouldn't you require your dust collector supplier to do the same.  You can request a sustainability report or other documentation as evidence of its green manufacturing initiatives.   The use of a VFD variable-frequency drive controls fan speed effectively and efficiently.

To read the full article and learn additional steps to consider for a truly sustainable dust collection system please visit Green Manufacturer Magazine.
You may also find more information regarding the EPA Standards here.




Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Industrial Dust And The Human Body

Sometimes we get caught up in the mechanics, regulations, and safety of why an industrial dust collection system is needed.  Other times we are concerned with combustible dust and it's dangers, but what about the effects of dust on the human body.

Whenever people inhale airborne dust at work, they are at risk of occupational disease. Year after year, both in developed and in developing countries, overexposure to dusts causes disease, temporary and permanent disabilities and deaths.  The World Health Organization offers documents to help educate and train people and employers in the prevention and control of dust in the workplace.

Irritant dust can settle in the nose and may lead to inflammation of the mucus membrane as well as inflammation of the trachea or the bronchi.  According to the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety "The lungs are constantly exposed to danger from the dusts we breathe."  The most dramatic dust reaction of the lung occurs in the deepest parts of the organ, leaving scarring and impaired normal lung function.  The amount of dust particles that settle in the lung also effect the capacity of the lung and the ability to take full deep breathes.   Many lung diseases are caused by inorganic dust exposure to silica, tin, tungsten carbide and coal.  Even organic dust such as hair particles, hay, and dust of heat treated sludge can cause disease to the lung.

The eyes are not immune to the effects of dust particles.  Even most safety glasses allow small dust particles to reach the eye causing irritation and/or possible damage to the cornea.   OSHA has certain standards in place to limit exposures to specific dust and fumes.  Inhalation of cobalt metal, dust and fumes may cause interstitial fibrosis, interstitial pneumonitis, myocardial and thyroid disorders, and sensitization of the respiratory tract and skin.   Some diseases of the heart have been linked to dust and fumes.

You can find out more about health and dust related issues through the following links.
World Health Organization
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety
OSHA


Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Article: From Dust To Death - Six tips to stop dust collector explosions




Preventing combustible dust explosions has been an industry concern for years.   Increasing the stress for emergency health and safety managers trying to find the correct solution and maintain that solution for the future as well.  With so many standards, regulations, and codes one can get easily overwhelmed.  A recent article in ISHN Magazine by industry experts Tony Supine and Mike Walters condense the tedious task into a few informative tips.   

Reviewing the NFPA 654 standard will give you information on how to design a safe dust collection system.  It will also guide you to other NFPA standards regarding deflagration venting, explosion protection where venting is not possible, as well as standards for specific types of combustible dust and industries.   The NFPA has incorporated performance-based options, since 1995 using calculations in its standards for explosion protection equipment.   Since 2006 the NFPA has been allowing real world destructive test data to be used in place of the calculations data, as long as adequate testing has been proven.   Although often overlooked, real world data is permissible and your dust collection supplier may help you with cost savings and from over engineering,  all while not compromising safety.  

A hazard analysis is required to determine the level of fire and explosion protection required.  Testing the dust to determine the KST rating and Pmax by ASTM E 1226-10 standard needs to be established.  Quality is often overruled by a low price.   Is the value what it seems?  As documented a low-end dust collector will most likely need replacing after an explosion, where as a high quality gauge collector often only requires replacing only the explosion vent and filter cartridges.   High quality compliant equipment is reassurance and an investment in the future.   Keeping a clean facility is another key element in preventing dust explosions.  Hazardous levels of dust accumulation are the most common of all OSHA violations, often ending with fines.  The NFPA definition of hazardous surface dust is now 1/64 inch or 0.4mm in depth.   Staying alert of any changing conditions that can contribute to potential explosive problems should be normal practice.